Tomb U-j Bone and Ivory Labels
composition: probable
witness: the labels themselves, excavated by the German Archaeological Institute at Umm el-Qaab beginning in 1988
More than 150 small bone and ivory labels, incised with numerals and signs that some specialists read as early place-names or commodity notations, were attached to grave goods in tomb U-j at Abydos and rank among the earliest Egyptian writing presently known; their date range overlaps the earliest Mesopotamian proto-cuneiform closely enough that whether Egyptian recording developed independently or was partly stimulated by interregional contact remains debated rather than settled.
- among the earliest Egyptian writing presently known, incised on small bone and ivory labels
- signs read by the excavator as commodity notations and place-names attached to tomb U-j's grave goods, a reading that remains debated
- date range overlaps Mesopotamia's earliest proto-cuneiform, feeding an unresolved independent-versus-stimulated invention debate
- found within the Umm el-Qaab royal necropolis, later ringed by First Dynasty subsidiary burials
Excavated from the 1980s onward by the German Archaeological Institute at Umm el-Qaab, tomb U-j belonged to a Predynastic Abydos ruler and contained more than 150 small tags of bone and ivory, pierced for attachment to jars and other grave goods. Their incised signs combine simple numerals with pictorial marks that the excavator, Gunter Dreyer, has read as place-names or commodity sources, a debated but influential interpretation; if correct, the labels document an administrative system already tracking goods and their origins for the royal household. The tomb lies within the Umm el-Qaab royal necropolis, where slightly later First Dynasty royal tombs are ringed by subsidiary burials interpreted as evidence that members of the court were killed or otherwise selected to accompany the ruler in death, though the extent of such sacrifice is debated. Whether Egypt's roughly contemporary recording system arose independently of Mesopotamia's or was partly stimulated by contact remains unresolved.
Commentary
Readers' notes on this work. No account needed - be scholarly, or at least civil.
Loading commentary…