Yantie Lun
鹽鐵論 (Discourses on Salt and Iron)
State monopolies on salt and iron, defended by Legalist-minded ministers as necessary revenue for frontier defense, in fact impoverish ordinary farmers and merchants and corrupt government by rewarding profit-seeking officials, so a Confucian court should restore private production and govern instead through frugality and moral example.
- debate over state monopolies on salt and iron
- Confucian critique of Legalist economic policy
- rare surviving record of adversarial Han court debate
- primary source on Han frontier finance
A dramatized record of an actual court conference held in 81 BC, in which Confucian-leaning scholars, newly summoned to advise the young Emperor Zhao, argued against incumbent Legalist ministers over whether the Han state should continue Emperor Wu's policy of government monopolies on salt, iron, and liquor, monopolies that had funded expensive wars against the Xiongnu but were widely blamed for high prices and rural hardship. Compiled somewhat after the fact by Huan Kuan into 60 chapters of formal debate, it is a rare surviving instance of sustained, adversarial Han policy argument on economic and foreign policy, and remains a primary source for Confucian critiques of state economic intervention.
Commentary
Readers' notes on this work. No account needed - be scholarly, or at least civil.
Loading commentary…